I have just returned from Phoenix, Arizona
where I believe I was witness to a portend of biblical proportions, “Cats and
dogs, living together, mass hysteria!” (Thank you, Dr. Venkman). In an auditorium of a satellite campus of
Arizona State University, I observed a Colonel of Operations, who actually knew the
first name of a Colonel of Acquisition! Those of you who understand the previously chasm between
operations, training and doctrine, and the acquisition community will
appreciate the implications of this sea change.
Where previously these two communities threw things over the wall to
each other, it now appears that they are executing Manning –like (Eli, not
Peyton) handoffs. Perhaps rapid equipping has come of age. This hastily arranged, low cost meeting, not
without its warts, set the standard for energy conferences.
The Army, Academia, and Industry gathered to conduct a series of briefings on processes and technologies. The doyenne of operational energy, Sharon
Burke, opened the conference entitled, “Net Zero at the Tactical Edge”. Despite being harangued for not getting her
Operational Energy implementation plan out in a timely manner and for failing
to get the new SecDef to include energy in his priorities, she set a positive
tone for the conference. Anybody who can
reference Jane Austen and Carl von Clausewitz in the same sentence gets a
little latitude. In her defense, the
relatively new SecDef may not get it ... yet.
The hand on the tiller for this ship was the director of the
Rapid Equipping Force, Colonel Pete Newell.
I interviewed Newell previously about the role of the REF
in operational energy. Newell looks and sounds like
a warfighter and he understands the complexity of the Requirements and Acquisition processes. His take is that OE is nothing special, just
another challenge commanders face on the battlefield and that it is his
organization’s mission: to find the
technology solutions. What is different
is his recognition of the need to bring together the Training and Doctrine
Command (TRADOC) and the Program Managers so that requirements can be expedited
and the PMs can satisfy those requirements. This is the path to long term, secure OE.
The team is together, but TRADOC has yet to produce the Capability Development Document
necessary for the PMs to begin their acquisition process. This is still on the shoulders of the Army
Capabilities Integration Center (sorry to classmate, Keith), Combat Arms
Support Command (CASCOM) and TRADOC Capabilities Manager, Soldier. These organizations are responsible for describing
the requirements for operational energy from the individual soldier to the
Forward Operating Base level.
The speakers' materials were superb, although they all prepared PC PowerPoint briefings that were butchered by the Macintosh computer used to
display them. The information they
provided on the four different venues and four different processes for bringing technologies into the Army’s experimentation effort was a bit mind
numbing. I challenged COL Newell on
this, and, in a surprisingly glass half full way, he pointed out that they
should be thought of as four paths to success.
The REF’s Bill Garland promised to publish a simple document helping
industry understand what path would suit them best. Will let you know when and where that is
available.
The best aspect of the conference was the fifteen minute
meetings that industry could schedule with program managers and the REF. The chance to sit down one on one and present
technologies and receive advice in a small, dare I say, intimate setting was
unparalleled. More on this, the pathways, and advice to conference hosts in the next post. Dan Nolan
1 comment:
DOD should not take this energy challenges lightly as they may have great impact on future generations. It would be best if they address them and make viable solutions.
Post a Comment